edinburgh: is populated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.57
, location
Weight: 0.54
, centre
Weight: 0.54
, london
Weight: 0.54
Siblings richmond
Weight: 0.34
, birmingham
Weight: 0.33
, dublin
Weight: 0.33
, norfolk
Weight: 0.33
, devon
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is populated 1.00
is densely populated 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(london, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(edinburgh, is populated)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(edinburgh, is populated)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(london, is densely populated)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(edinburgh, is populated)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(london, is densely populated)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(edinburgh, is populated)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, is densely populated)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(edinburgh, is populated)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(dublin, is populated)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(edinburgh, is populated)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, is populated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(london, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(edinburgh, is populated)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(edinburgh, is populated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(edinburgh, is populated)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(birmingham, is populated)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(birmingham, is populated)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(edinburgh, is populated)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(dublin, is populated)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(dublin, is populated)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(edinburgh, is populated)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(birmingham, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(birmingham, is densely populated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(edinburgh, is populated)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(edinburgh, is populated)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(edinburgh, is populated)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(edinburgh, is densely populated)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(edinburgh, is populated)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(edinburgh, is densely populated)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(edinburgh, is populated)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(edinburgh, is densely populated)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(edinburgh, is populated)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(edinburgh, is densely populated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(edinburgh, is populated)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(edinburgh, is populated)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(edinburgh, is populated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(edinburgh, is populated)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(edinburgh, is populated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(edinburgh, is populated)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(london, is densely populated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(edinburgh, is populated)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(birmingham, is populated)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(edinburgh, is populated)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(dublin, is populated)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(edinburgh, is populated)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(birmingham, is densely populated)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(edinburgh, is populated)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(london, is densely populated)