edmonton: is hell hole

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.58
, city
Weight: 0.55
, london
Weight: 0.53
, canada
Weight: 0.50
Siblings montreal
Weight: 0.34
, toronto
Weight: 0.34
, quebec city
Weight: 0.34
, lexington
Weight: 0.34
, denver
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hell hole 1.00
is hell hole compared 0.95
is bland hell hole 0.90
is bland hell hole compared 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(edmonton, is hell hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(edmonton, is hell hole)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(edmonton, is hell hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(edmonton, is bland hell hole)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(edmonton, is hell hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(edmonton, is hell hole compared)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(edmonton, is hell hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(edmonton, is hell hole compared)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(edmonton, is hell hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(edmonton, is hell hole compared)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(edmonton, is hell hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(edmonton, is bland hell hole)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(edmonton, is hell hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(edmonton, is bland hell hole)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(edmonton, is hell hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(edmonton, is bland hell hole compared)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(edmonton, is hell hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(edmonton, is bland hell hole compared)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(edmonton, is hell hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(edmonton, is bland hell hole compared)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(edmonton, is hell hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(edmonton, is bland hell hole)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(edmonton, is hell hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(edmonton, is hell hole compared)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(edmonton, is hell hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(edmonton, is bland hell hole compared)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(edmonton, is hell hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(edmonton, is hell hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(edmonton, is hell hole)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(edmonton, is hell hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(edmonton, is hell hole)