effect: be important in theatre

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents element
Weight: 0.65
, variable
Weight: 0.64
, greenhouse effect
Weight: 0.62
, aspect
Weight: 0.61
Siblings depth
Weight: 0.62
, rise
Weight: 0.61
, viscosity
Weight: 0.61
, weight
Weight: 0.59
, phase
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in theatre 1.00
be important in history 0.85
be important in science 0.79
be important in writing 0.78
be useful 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(variable, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(effect, be important in theatre)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(effect, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(variable, be important in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(effect, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(variable, be important in science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(variable, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(effect, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(effect, be important in theatre)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(effect, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(effect, be important in theatre)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(effect, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(effect, be useful)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(effect, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(effect, be important in history)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(effect, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(effect, be important in writing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(effect, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(effect, be important in science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(effect, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(effect, be important in science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(effect, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(effect, be important in history)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(effect, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(effect, be useful)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(effect, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(effect, be important in writing)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(effect, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(effect, be important in science)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(effect, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(effect, be important in writing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(effect, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(effect, be important in history)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(effect, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(effect, be important in writing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(effect, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(effect, be important in science)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(effect, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(effect, be useful)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(effect, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(effect, be important in history)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(effect, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(effect, be useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(effect, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(effect, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(effect, be important in theatre)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(effect, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(effect, be important in theatre)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(effect, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(variable, be important in science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(effect, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(variable, be important in science)