effect: be on shot calculated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents element
Weight: 0.65
, variable
Weight: 0.64
, greenhouse effect
Weight: 0.62
, aspect
Weight: 0.61
Siblings depth
Weight: 0.62
, rise
Weight: 0.61
, viscosity
Weight: 0.61
, weight
Weight: 0.59
, phase
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on shot calculated 1.00
be on shot 0.88
be calculated 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(effect, be on shot calculated)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(weight, be calculated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(effect, be on shot calculated)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(weight, be calculated)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(weight, be calculated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(effect, be on shot calculated)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(effect, be on shot calculated)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(effect, be on shot calculated)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(effect, be calculated)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(effect, be on shot calculated)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(effect, be on shot)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(effect, be on shot calculated)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(effect, be on shot)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(effect, be on shot calculated)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(effect, be on shot)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(effect, be on shot calculated)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(effect, be on shot)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(effect, be on shot calculated)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(effect, be calculated)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(effect, be on shot calculated)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(effect, be calculated)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(effect, be on shot calculated)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(effect, be calculated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(effect, be on shot calculated)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(effect, be on shot calculated)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(effect, be on shot calculated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(effect, be on shot calculated)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(effect, be on shot calculated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(effect, be on shot calculated)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(weight, be calculated)