ego: is outfitters

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.52
, illusion
Weight: 0.50
Siblings jealousy
Weight: 0.33
, think
Weight: 0.33
, lust
Weight: 0.33
, intellect
Weight: 0.32
, genius
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is outfitters 1.00
is urban outfitters 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(ego, is outfitters)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lust, is urban outfitters)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(ego, is outfitters)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(lust, is outfitters)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(ego, is outfitters)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(lust, is outfitters)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(lust, is outfitters)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(ego, is outfitters)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(lust, is urban outfitters)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(lust, is urban outfitters)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(ego, is outfitters)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(ego, is outfitters)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(ego, is outfitters)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(ego, is urban outfitters)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(ego, is outfitters)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(ego, is urban outfitters)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(ego, is outfitters)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ego, is urban outfitters)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(ego, is outfitters)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ego, is urban outfitters)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(ego, is outfitters)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ego, is outfitters)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(ego, is outfitters)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(ego, is outfitters)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ego, is outfitters)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(ego, is outfitters)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(lust, is outfitters)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(ego, is outfitters)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(lust, is urban outfitters)