eiffel tower: be more than 100 year old

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents monument
Weight: 0.71
, structure
Weight: 0.69
, landmark
Weight: 0.66
, golden gate bridge
Weight: 0.66
, location
Weight: 0.64
Siblings tower
Weight: 0.40
, control tower
Weight: 0.37
, skyscraper
Weight: 0.37
, national monument
Weight: 0.35
, statue
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more than 100 year old 1.00
be at old part of city 0.78
be used to more office in less grind area 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(monument, be at old part of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(eiffel tower, be more than 100 year old)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(eiffel tower, be more than 100 year old) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(monument, be at old part of city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(eiffel tower, be more than 100 year old) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(monument, be at old part of city)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(eiffel tower, be more than 100 year old) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(skyscraper, be used to more office in less grind area)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(monument, be at old part of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(eiffel tower, be more than 100 year old) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(eiffel tower, be more than 100 year old)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(eiffel tower, be more than 100 year old) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(skyscraper, be used to more office in less grind area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(skyscraper, be used to more office in less grind area)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(eiffel tower, be more than 100 year old) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(eiffel tower, be more than 100 year old)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(eiffel tower, be more than 100 year old) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(eiffel tower, be more than 100 year old) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(eiffel tower, be more than 100 year old)

Typical implies Plausible

0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(eiffel tower, be more than 100 year old) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(eiffel tower, be more than 100 year old)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(eiffel tower, be more than 100 year old) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(monument, be at old part of city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(eiffel tower, be more than 100 year old) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(skyscraper, be used to more office in less grind area)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(eiffel tower, be more than 100 year old) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(monument, be at old part of city)