eiffel tower: be wonder of world

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents building
Weight: 0.73
, monument
Weight: 0.71
, structure
Weight: 0.69
, landmark
Weight: 0.66
, golden gate bridge
Weight: 0.66
Siblings tower
Weight: 0.42
, control tower
Weight: 0.40
, skyscraper
Weight: 0.37
, apartment building
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be wonder of world 1.00
is world wonder 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(golden gate bridge, be wonder of world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(eiffel tower, be wonder of world)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(eiffel tower, be wonder of world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(golden gate bridge, be wonder of world)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(eiffel tower, be wonder of world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(golden gate bridge, be wonder of world)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(golden gate bridge, be wonder of world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(eiffel tower, be wonder of world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(eiffel tower, be wonder of world)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(eiffel tower, be wonder of world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(eiffel tower, be wonder of world)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(eiffel tower, be wonder of world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(eiffel tower, is world wonder)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(eiffel tower, be wonder of world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(eiffel tower, is world wonder)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(eiffel tower, be wonder of world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(eiffel tower, is world wonder)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(eiffel tower, be wonder of world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(eiffel tower, is world wonder)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(eiffel tower, be wonder of world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(eiffel tower, be wonder of world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(eiffel tower, be wonder of world)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(eiffel tower, be wonder of world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(eiffel tower, be wonder of world)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(eiffel tower, be wonder of world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(golden gate bridge, be wonder of world)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(eiffel tower, be wonder of world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(golden gate bridge, be wonder of world)