elasticity: affect revenue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, parameter
Weight: 0.60
, quality
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, property
Weight: 0.57
Siblings tensile strength
Weight: 0.35
, characteristic
Weight: 0.34
, viscosity
Weight: 0.34
, texture
Weight: 0.33
, permeability
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect revenue 1.00
affect total revenue 0.94
affect business 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(factor, affect business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(elasticity, affect revenue)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(elasticity, affect revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(factor, affect business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(elasticity, affect revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(factor, affect business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(factor, affect business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(elasticity, affect revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(elasticity, affect revenue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(elasticity, affect revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(elasticity, affect revenue)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(elasticity, affect revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(elasticity, affect total revenue)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(elasticity, affect revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(elasticity, affect total revenue)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(elasticity, affect revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(elasticity, affect total revenue)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(elasticity, affect revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(elasticity, affect total revenue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(elasticity, affect revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(elasticity, affect revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(elasticity, affect revenue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(elasticity, affect revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(elasticity, affect revenue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(elasticity, affect revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, affect business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(elasticity, affect revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, affect business)