elasticity: be measure of responsiveness

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, parameter
Weight: 0.60
, quality
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, property
Weight: 0.57
Siblings tensile strength
Weight: 0.35
, characteristic
Weight: 0.34
, viscosity
Weight: 0.34
, texture
Weight: 0.33
, permeability
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be measure of responsiveness 1.00
contribute to effectiveness essence 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(quality, contribute to effectiveness essence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(elasticity, be measure of responsiveness)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(elasticity, be measure of responsiveness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(quality, contribute to effectiveness essence)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(elasticity, be measure of responsiveness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(quality, contribute to effectiveness essence)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(quality, contribute to effectiveness essence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(elasticity, be measure of responsiveness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(elasticity, be measure of responsiveness)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(elasticity, be measure of responsiveness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(elasticity, be measure of responsiveness)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(elasticity, be measure of responsiveness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(elasticity, be measure of responsiveness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(elasticity, be measure of responsiveness)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(elasticity, be measure of responsiveness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(elasticity, be measure of responsiveness)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(elasticity, be measure of responsiveness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(quality, contribute to effectiveness essence)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(elasticity, be measure of responsiveness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(quality, contribute to effectiveness essence)