election: be in 2017

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents general election
Weight: 0.84
, ballot
Weight: 0.69
, event
Weight: 0.62
, process
Weight: 0.61
Siblings primary
Weight: 0.63
, delegate
Weight: 0.54
, midterm
Weight: 0.48
, vote
Weight: 0.34
, national convention
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in wwi 1.00
be in 1754 1.00
be in 2017 1.00
be time-consuming 0.88
being are held in ksa 0.82
be for today 0.80
being are held 0.80
be in may 0.78
be in dprk work 0.78
be called at time 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(general election, be in 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(election, be in 2017)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(process, be time-consuming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(election, be in 2017)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(election, be in 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(process, be time-consuming)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(election, be in 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(general election, be in 2017)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(election, be in 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(general election, be in 2017)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(election, be in 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(process, be time-consuming)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(election, be in 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(vote, be called at time)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(general election, be in 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(election, be in 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(election, be in 2017)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(process, be time-consuming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(election, be in 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(election, be in 2017)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(election, be in 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(vote, be called at time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(vote, be called at time)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(election, be in 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(election, be in 2017)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(election, be in 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(election, be for today)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(election, be in 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(election, be for today)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(election, be in 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(election, be for today)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(election, be in 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(election, be in may)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(election, be in 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(election, be for today)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(election, be in 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(election, be in may)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(election, be in 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(election, be in may)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(election, be in 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(election, be in may)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(election, be in 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(election, be in 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(election, be in 2017)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(election, be in 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(election, be in 2017)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(election, be in 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(process, be time-consuming)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(election, be in 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(general election, be in 2017)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(election, be in 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(vote, be called at time)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(election, be in 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(process, be time-consuming)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(election, be in 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(general election, be in 2017)