electric razor: be at wal-mart

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents razor
Weight: 0.68
, item
Weight: 0.57
, product
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, device
Weight: 0.53
Siblings disposable razor
Weight: 0.39
, electric toothbrush
Weight: 0.36
, electric blanket
Weight: 0.35
, electric motor
Weight: 0.34
, electric shock
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at k-mart 1.00
be at wal-mart 1.00
be at place 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(thing, be at place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(electric razor, be at wal-mart)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(electric razor, be at wal-mart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(thing, be at place)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(electric razor, be at wal-mart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(thing, be at place)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(thing, be at place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(electric razor, be at wal-mart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(electric razor, be at wal-mart)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(electric razor, be at wal-mart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(electric razor, be at wal-mart)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(electric razor, be at wal-mart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(electric razor, be at k-mart)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(electric razor, be at wal-mart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(electric razor, be at k-mart)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(electric razor, be at wal-mart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(electric razor, be at k-mart)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(electric razor, be at wal-mart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(electric razor, be at k-mart)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(electric razor, be at wal-mart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(electric razor, be at wal-mart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(electric razor, be at wal-mart)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(electric razor, be at wal-mart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(electric razor, be at wal-mart)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(electric razor, be at wal-mart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(thing, be at place)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(electric razor, be at wal-mart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(thing, be at place)