electric shock: is vegan

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.65
, punishment
Weight: 0.63
, injury
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, device
Weight: 0.62
Siblings electric motor
Weight: 0.37
, electric toothbrush
Weight: 0.36
, electric heater
Weight: 0.35
, electric fan
Weight: 0.35
, electric eel
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is vegan 1.00
is vegetarian 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric shock, is vegan)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is vegan)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric shock, is vegan)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(electric toothbrush, is vegan)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(electric shock, is vegan)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(electric heater, is vegan)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(electric heater, is vegan)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(electric shock, is vegan)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(electric toothbrush, is vegan)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(electric toothbrush, is vegan)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(electric shock, is vegan)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(electric shock, is vegan)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(electric shock, is vegan)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(electric shock, is vegetarian)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(electric shock, is vegan)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(electric shock, is vegetarian)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(electric shock, is vegan)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(electric shock, is vegetarian)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(electric shock, is vegan)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(electric shock, is vegetarian)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(electric shock, is vegan)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(electric shock, is vegan)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric shock, is vegan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(electric shock, is vegan)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(electric shock, is vegan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric shock, is vegan)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(electric heater, is vegan)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric shock, is vegan)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(electric toothbrush, is vegan)