electrician: do

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents worker
Weight: 0.66
, mechanic
Weight: 0.64
, construction worker
Weight: 0.63
, craftsman
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.58
Siblings machinist
Weight: 0.37
, carpenter
Weight: 0.37
, office worker
Weight: 0.36
, auto mechanic
Weight: 0.36
, janitor
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
do 1.00
do to work building 0.81
is done 0.81
need work 0.80
is mean 0.78
take means 0.77
go crazy 0.77
mean 0.77
take means today 0.77
know about law 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(craftsman, do)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(electrician, do)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(construction worker, is mean)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(electrician, do)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(construction worker, need work)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(electrician, do)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(electrician, do)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(craftsman, do)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(electrician, do)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(construction worker, need work)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(electrician, do)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(construction worker, is mean)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(electrician, do)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(craftsman, do)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(electrician, do)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is mean)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(electrician, do)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, need work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(electrician, do)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, mean)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(craftsman, do)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(electrician, do)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(electrician, do)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(construction worker, need work)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(electrician, do)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(electrician, do)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(construction worker, is mean)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(electrician, do)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(electrician, do)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(electrician, do)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(carpenter, mean)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(carpenter, mean)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(electrician, do)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(electrician, do)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(electrician, do)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(electrician, do)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(electrician, do)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(electrician, do)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(electrician, do)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(electrician, do)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(craftsman, do)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(electrician, do)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(construction worker, need work)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(electrician, do)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(construction worker, is mean)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(electrician, do)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(carpenter, mean)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(electrician, do)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(craftsman, do)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(electrician, do)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(construction worker, need work)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(electrician, do)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(construction worker, is mean)