electronic device: be banned in psych wards

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.74
, instrument
Weight: 0.70
, material
Weight: 0.69
, accessory
Weight: 0.66
Siblings network device
Weight: 0.83
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.80
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.79
, digital camera
Weight: 0.76
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.76

Related properties

Property Similarity
be banned in psych wards 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(device, be banned in psych wards)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(electronic device, be banned in psych wards)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(electronic device, be banned in psych wards)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(device, be banned in psych wards)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, be banned in psych wards)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(device, be banned in psych wards)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(device, be banned in psych wards)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(electronic device, be banned in psych wards)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(electronic device, be banned in psych wards)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(electronic device, be banned in psych wards)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(electronic device, be banned in psych wards)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(electronic device, be banned in psych wards)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(electronic device, be banned in psych wards)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, be banned in psych wards)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(electronic device, be banned in psych wards)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(electronic device, be banned in psych wards)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, be banned in psych wards)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(device, be banned in psych wards)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(electronic device, be banned in psych wards)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(device, be banned in psych wards)