electronic device: be rated at 025

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.74
, instrument
Weight: 0.70
, material
Weight: 0.69
, accessory
Weight: 0.66
Siblings network device
Weight: 0.83
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.80
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.79
, digital camera
Weight: 0.76
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.76

Related properties

Property Similarity
be rated at 025 1.00
be rated around 800asa 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(device, be rated at 025) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(electronic device, be rated at 025)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(electronic device, be rated at 025) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(device, be rated at 025)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, be rated at 025) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(device, be rated at 025)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, be rated at 025) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be rated around 800asa)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(device, be rated at 025) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(electronic device, be rated at 025) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(electronic device, be rated at 025)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(electronic device, be rated at 025) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(digital camera, be rated around 800asa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be rated around 800asa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(electronic device, be rated at 025) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(electronic device, be rated at 025)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(electronic device, be rated at 025) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(electronic device, be rated at 025) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, be rated at 025)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(electronic device, be rated at 025) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(electronic device, be rated at 025)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, be rated at 025) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(device, be rated at 025)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, be rated at 025) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(digital camera, be rated around 800asa)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(electronic device, be rated at 025) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(device, be rated at 025)