electronic device: is jammer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.74
, instrument
Weight: 0.70
, material
Weight: 0.69
, accessory
Weight: 0.66
Siblings network device
Weight: 0.83
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.80
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.79
, digital camera
Weight: 0.76
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.76

Related properties

Property Similarity
is jammer 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(device, is jammer)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(electronic device, is jammer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(electronic device, is jammer)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(device, is jammer)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, is jammer)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(device, is jammer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(device, is jammer)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(electronic device, is jammer)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(electronic device, is jammer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(electronic device, is jammer)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(electronic device, is jammer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(electronic device, is jammer)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(electronic device, is jammer)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, is jammer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(electronic device, is jammer)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(electronic device, is jammer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, is jammer)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(device, is jammer)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(electronic device, is jammer)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(device, is jammer)