elephant: has physical part trunk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.74
, wild animal
Weight: 0.72
, mammal
Weight: 0.72
, species
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.64
Siblings african elephant
Weight: 0.77
, rhino
Weight: 0.39
, tiger
Weight: 0.38
, elephant seal
Weight: 0.38
, komodo dragon
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part trunk 1.00
has physical part legs 0.78
has physical part hair 0.77
has physical part pinnas 0.76
has physical part feet 0.76
has physical part ear 0.75
has physical part eyes 0.75
has physical part teeth 0.75
has physical part tail 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(elephant, has physical part trunk)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mammal, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(elephant, has physical part trunk)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(elephant, has physical part trunk)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(mammal, has physical part hair)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(elephant, has physical part trunk)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(elephant, has physical part trunk)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has physical part hair)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(elephant, has physical part trunk)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(elephant, has physical part trunk)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(african elephant, has physical part trunk)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(elephant, has physical part trunk)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(tiger, has physical part eyes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(elephant, has physical part trunk)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(african elephant, has physical part feet)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(elephant, has physical part trunk)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(elephant, has physical part trunk)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mammal, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(elephant, has physical part trunk)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(elephant, has physical part trunk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(elephant, has physical part trunk)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(african elephant, has physical part trunk)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(african elephant, has physical part trunk)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(elephant, has physical part trunk)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(african elephant, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(african elephant, has physical part feet)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(elephant, has physical part trunk)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(tiger, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(tiger, has physical part eyes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(elephant, has physical part trunk)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(elephant, has physical part trunk)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(elephant, has physical part trunk)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(elephant, has physical part feet)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(elephant, has physical part trunk)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(elephant, has physical part feet)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(elephant, has physical part trunk)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(elephant, has physical part feet)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(elephant, has physical part trunk)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(elephant, has physical part feet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(elephant, has physical part trunk)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(elephant, has physical part trunk)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(elephant, has physical part trunk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(elephant, has physical part trunk)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(elephant, has physical part trunk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(elephant, has physical part trunk)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part hair)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(elephant, has physical part trunk)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(elephant, has physical part trunk)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(african elephant, has physical part trunk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(elephant, has physical part trunk)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(african elephant, has physical part feet)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(elephant, has physical part trunk)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(tiger, has physical part eyes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(elephant, has physical part trunk)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part hair)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(elephant, has physical part trunk)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)