elephant: has physical part tusks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.74
, wild animal
Weight: 0.72
, mammal
Weight: 0.72
, species
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.64
Siblings african elephant
Weight: 0.77
, rhino
Weight: 0.39
, tiger
Weight: 0.38
, elephant seal
Weight: 0.38
, komodo dragon
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part tusks 1.00
have tusks for 0.97
have long tusks 0.96
use tusks 0.96
need tusks 0.96
have big tusks 0.96
have valuable tusks 0.94
lose tusks 0.94
grow tusks 0.94
have pink tusks 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(elephant, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(rhino, has physical part tusks)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(elephant, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(african elephant, has physical part tusks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(elephant, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(african elephant, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(african elephant, has physical part tusks)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(elephant, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(rhino, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(rhino, has physical part tusks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(elephant, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(elephant, has physical part tusks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(elephant, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(elephant, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(elephant, has physical part tusks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(elephant, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(elephant, has physical part tusks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(elephant, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(rhino, has physical part tusks)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(elephant, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(african elephant, has physical part tusks)