elephant: have flat feet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.74
, mammal
Weight: 0.72
, species
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.64
Siblings african elephant
Weight: 0.77
, rhino
Weight: 0.39
, tiger
Weight: 0.38
, elephant seal
Weight: 0.38
, komodo dragon
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have flat feet 1.00
have big feet 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(elephant, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(african elephant, have big feet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(elephant, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(african elephant, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(african elephant, have big feet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(elephant, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(elephant, have flat feet)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(elephant, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(elephant, have big feet)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(elephant, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(elephant, have big feet)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(elephant, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(elephant, have big feet)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(elephant, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(elephant, have big feet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(elephant, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(elephant, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(elephant, have flat feet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(elephant, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(elephant, have flat feet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(elephant, have flat feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(african elephant, have big feet)