elevation: affect taiga biome

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, attribute
Weight: 0.58
, parameter
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.58
Siblings altitude
Weight: 0.34
, slope
Weight: 0.33
, gradient
Weight: 0.33
, height
Weight: 0.32
, density
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect taiga biome 1.00
affect climate of desert 0.76
affect vegetation 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(elevation, affect taiga biome)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(altitude, affect climate of desert)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(elevation, affect taiga biome)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(altitude, affect climate of desert)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(altitude, affect climate of desert)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(elevation, affect taiga biome)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(elevation, affect taiga biome)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(elevation, affect taiga biome)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(elevation, affect vegetation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(elevation, affect taiga biome)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(elevation, affect vegetation)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(elevation, affect taiga biome)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(elevation, affect vegetation)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(elevation, affect taiga biome)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(elevation, affect vegetation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(elevation, affect taiga biome)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(elevation, affect taiga biome)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(elevation, affect taiga biome)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(elevation, affect taiga biome)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(elevation, affect taiga biome)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(elevation, affect taiga biome)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(altitude, affect climate of desert)