elevation: effect due potential energy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, attribute
Weight: 0.58
, parameter
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.58
Siblings altitude
Weight: 0.34
, slope
Weight: 0.33
, gradient
Weight: 0.33
, height
Weight: 0.32
, density
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
effect due potential energy 1.00
effect child development 0.76
be factor causing 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(factor, effect child development)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(elevation, effect due potential energy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(elevation, effect due potential energy)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(factor, effect child development)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(elevation, effect due potential energy)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(factor, effect child development)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(elevation, effect due potential energy)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(altitude, be factor causing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(factor, effect child development)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(elevation, effect due potential energy)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(elevation, effect due potential energy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(elevation, effect due potential energy)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(altitude, be factor causing)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(altitude, be factor causing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(elevation, effect due potential energy)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(elevation, effect due potential energy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(elevation, effect due potential energy)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(elevation, effect due potential energy)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(elevation, effect due potential energy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(elevation, effect due potential energy)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(elevation, effect due potential energy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(elevation, effect due potential energy)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(factor, effect child development)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(elevation, effect due potential energy)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(altitude, be factor causing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(elevation, effect due potential energy)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(factor, effect child development)