elevation: increase time of pasta

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, attribute
Weight: 0.58
, parameter
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.58
Siblings altitude
Weight: 0.34
, slope
Weight: 0.33
, gradient
Weight: 0.33
, height
Weight: 0.32
, density
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
increase time of pasta 1.00
increase cooking time of pasta 0.96
increase cooking time 0.85
increase time 0.80
cutting potato in half help 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(variable, cutting potato in half help)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(elevation, increase time of pasta)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(elevation, increase time of pasta)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(variable, cutting potato in half help)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(elevation, increase time of pasta)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(variable, cutting potato in half help)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(variable, cutting potato in half help)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(elevation, increase time of pasta)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(elevation, increase time of pasta)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(elevation, increase time of pasta)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(elevation, increase time of pasta)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(elevation, increase time of pasta)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(elevation, increase cooking time of pasta)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(elevation, increase time of pasta)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(elevation, increase cooking time of pasta)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(elevation, increase time of pasta)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(elevation, increase cooking time of pasta)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(elevation, increase time of pasta)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(elevation, increase cooking time of pasta)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(elevation, increase time of pasta)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(elevation, increase time of pasta)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(elevation, increase time of pasta)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(elevation, increase time of pasta)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(elevation, increase time of pasta)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(elevation, increase time of pasta)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(variable, cutting potato in half help)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(elevation, increase time of pasta)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(variable, cutting potato in half help)