elevator: be at hotel

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.61
, stairway
Weight: 0.59
, object
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.57
, equipment
Weight: 0.55
Siblings stairwell
Weight: 0.34
, basement
Weight: 0.33
, wheelchair
Weight: 0.33
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.33
, car alarm
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at hotel 1.00
be at apartment 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(elevator, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(smoke detector, be at apartment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(elevator, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(smoke detector, be at apartment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(smoke detector, be at apartment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(elevator, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(elevator, be at hotel)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(elevator, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(elevator, be at hotel)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(elevator, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(elevator, be at hotel)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(elevator, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(elevator, be at hotel)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(elevator, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(elevator, be at hotel)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(elevator, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(elevator, be at apartment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(elevator, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(elevator, be at apartment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(elevator, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(elevator, be at apartment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(elevator, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(elevator, be at apartment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(elevator, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(elevator, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(elevator, be at hotel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(elevator, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(elevator, be at hotel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(elevator, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(smoke detector, be at apartment)