elevator: is broken

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents apparatus
Weight: 0.61
, device
Weight: 0.61
, stairway
Weight: 0.59
, object
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.57
Siblings stairwell
Weight: 0.34
, basement
Weight: 0.33
, wheelchair
Weight: 0.33
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.33
, car alarm
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is broken 1.00
be broke on bang 0.78
be broke on big bang 0.77
be broke on bang theory 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(elevator, is broken)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(elevator, is broken)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(elevator, is broken)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(elevator, be broke on big bang)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(elevator, is broken)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(elevator, be broke on big bang)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(elevator, is broken)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(elevator, be broke on big bang)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(elevator, is broken)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(elevator, be broke on big bang)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(elevator, is broken)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(elevator, is broken)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(elevator, is broken)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(elevator, is broken)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(elevator, is broken)