:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(elf, wear hats)
⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(gnome, wear hats)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(elf, wear hats)
⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(elf, wear hats)
Similarity expansion
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(elf, wear hats)
⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(elf, wear white)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(elf, wear hats)
⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(elf, wear white)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(elf, wear hats)
⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(elf, wear white)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(elf, wear hats)
⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(elf, wear white)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(elf, wear hats)
⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(elf, wear hats)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(elf, wear hats)
⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(gnome, wear hats)