elisa: be useful as diagnostic tests

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.60
, application
Weight: 0.55
, method
Weight: 0.52
, substrate
Weight: 0.49
, antibody
Weight: 0.49
Siblings ajax
Weight: 0.32
, vcr
Weight: 0.32
, lcd
Weight: 0.32
, mri
Weight: 0.32
, scanner
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful as diagnostic tests 1.00
be useful as tests 0.93
test 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(elisa, be useful as diagnostic tests)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mri, test)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(elisa, be useful as diagnostic tests)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(mri, test)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(mri, test)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(elisa, be useful as diagnostic tests)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(elisa, be useful as diagnostic tests)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(elisa, be useful as diagnostic tests)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(elisa, be useful as tests)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(elisa, be useful as diagnostic tests)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(elisa, be useful as tests)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(elisa, be useful as diagnostic tests)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(elisa, be useful as tests)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(elisa, be useful as diagnostic tests)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(elisa, test)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(elisa, be useful as diagnostic tests)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(elisa, test)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(elisa, be useful as diagnostic tests)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(elisa, test)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(elisa, be useful as diagnostic tests)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(elisa, be useful as tests)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(elisa, be useful as diagnostic tests)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(elisa, test)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(elisa, be useful as diagnostic tests)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(elisa, be useful as diagnostic tests)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(elisa, be useful as diagnostic tests)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(elisa, be useful as diagnostic tests)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(elisa, be useful as diagnostic tests)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(elisa, be useful as diagnostic tests)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mri, test)