elk: protect themselves

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.76
, animal
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.68
, deer
Weight: 0.67
, meat
Weight: 0.64
Siblings moose
Weight: 0.64
, bison
Weight: 0.40
, wolf
Weight: 0.39
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
protect themselves 1.00
defend themselves 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(elk, protect themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(moose, defend themselves)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(elk, protect themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, defend themselves)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(elk, protect themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(moose, protect themselves)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(elk, protect themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(moose, protect themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(moose, protect themselves)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(elk, protect themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(moose, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(moose, defend themselves)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(elk, protect themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(grizzly bear, defend themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(grizzly bear, defend themselves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(elk, protect themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(elk, protect themselves)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(elk, protect themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(elk, defend themselves)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(elk, protect themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(elk, defend themselves)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(elk, protect themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(elk, defend themselves)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(elk, protect themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(elk, defend themselves)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(elk, protect themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(elk, protect themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(elk, protect themselves)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(elk, protect themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(elk, protect themselves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(elk, protect themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(moose, protect themselves)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(elk, protect themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(moose, defend themselves)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(elk, protect themselves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(grizzly bear, defend themselves)