elvis: was different

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents legend
Weight: 0.66
, entertainer
Weight: 0.65
, icon
Weight: 0.64
, musician
Weight: 0.62
, performer
Weight: 0.60
Siblings michael jackson
Weight: 0.36
, billy joel
Weight: 0.36
, louis armstrong
Weight: 0.36
, stephen king
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was different 1.00
was presley important in 1960s 0.80
was presley important in 1967 0.80
was presly remeberd 0.80
was presley famase 0.80
was presley 0.80
was presley unique 0.80
be similar 0.77
was important today 0.77
was presley special 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(elvis, was different)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(elvis, was presley)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(elvis, was presly remeberd)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(elvis, was presley)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(elvis, was presley famase)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(elvis, was presly remeberd)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(elvis, was presley famase)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(elvis, was presly remeberd)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(elvis, was presley famase)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(elvis, was presley)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(elvis, was presley famase)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(elvis, was presley important in 1967)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(elvis, was presley unique)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(elvis, was presley important in 1967)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(elvis, was presley unique)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(elvis, was presley unique)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(elvis, was presley important in 1960s)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(elvis, was presley important in 1967)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(elvis, was presly remeberd)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(elvis, was important today)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(elvis, was presley important in 1960s)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(elvis, was presley important in 1967)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(elvis, was presley special)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(elvis, was presley important in 1960s)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(elvis, was presley special)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(elvis, was important today)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(elvis, was important today)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(elvis, was presley special)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(elvis, was presley important in 1960s)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(elvis, was important today)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(elvis, was presley special)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(elvis, was presley unique)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(elvis, was presley)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(elvis, was different)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(elvis, was different)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(elvis, was different)