email: fail send

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents page
Weight: 0.63
, letter
Weight: 0.62
, web site
Weight: 0.61
, gift
Weight: 0.61
Siblings junk mail
Weight: 0.65
, complaint
Weight: 0.60
, reminder
Weight: 0.57
, id
Weight: 0.56
, thunderbird
Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property Similarity
fail send 1.00
take long send 0.87
fail deliver 0.86
get sent 0.80
keep sending 0.79
be sent 0.78
get sent back 0.78
send twice emails 0.77
get sent twice 0.77
take long receive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(email, fail send)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(thunderbird, send twice emails)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.21
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(email, fail send)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(thunderbird, send twice emails)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(thunderbird, send twice emails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(email, fail send)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(email, fail send)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(email, fail send)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(email, be sent)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(email, fail send)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(email, be sent)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(email, fail send)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(email, be sent)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(email, fail send)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(email, take long receive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(email, fail send)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(email, take long receive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(email, fail send)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(email, take long receive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(email, fail send)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(email, take long receive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(email, fail send)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(email, be sent)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(email, fail send)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(email, fail send)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(email, fail send)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(email, fail send)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(email, fail send)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(email, fail send)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(thunderbird, send twice emails)