email: go inbox

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents page
Weight: 0.63
, letter
Weight: 0.62
, web site
Weight: 0.61
, gift
Weight: 0.61
Siblings junk mail
Weight: 0.65
, complaint
Weight: 0.60
, reminder
Weight: 0.57
, id
Weight: 0.56
, thunderbird
Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property Similarity
go inbox 1.00
be determined inbox 0.97
disappear from inbox 0.97
end up in spam folder 0.77
go into junk folder 0.75
is email 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(email, go inbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(complaint, is email)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(email, go inbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(complaint, is email) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(complaint, is email)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(email, go inbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(email, go inbox)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(email, go inbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(email, disappear from inbox)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(email, go inbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(email, disappear from inbox)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(email, go inbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(email, disappear from inbox)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(email, go inbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(email, disappear from inbox)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(email, go inbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(email, be determined inbox)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(email, go inbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(email, be determined inbox)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(email, go inbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(email, be determined inbox)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(email, go inbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(email, be determined inbox)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(email, go inbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(email, go inbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(email, go inbox)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(email, go inbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(email, go inbox)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(email, go inbox) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(complaint, is email)