emotion: get best of us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feeling
Weight: 0.68
, element
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.63
, dimension
Weight: 0.60
, trait
Weight: 0.59
Siblings compassion
Weight: 0.76
, empathy
Weight: 0.74
, affection
Weight: 0.73
, passion
Weight: 0.70
, kindness
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
get best of us 1.00
get best 0.92
do have them 0.85
is good thing 0.82
feel good 0.80
has quality good 0.76
feel bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(dimension, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(emotion, get best of us)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(feeling, feel good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(emotion, get best of us)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(feeling, feel good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(dimension, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(feeling, feel good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(dimension, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(empathy, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(affection, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(kindness, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(compassion, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(passion, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(dimension, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(emotion, get best of us)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(feeling, feel good)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(emotion, get best of us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(passion, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(passion, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(compassion, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(compassion, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(empathy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(empathy, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(affection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(affection, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(kindness, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(kindness, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(emotion, get best of us)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(emotion, do have them)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(emotion, do have them)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(emotion, do have them)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(emotion, feel good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(emotion, feel good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(emotion, feel good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(emotion, is good thing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(emotion, is good thing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(emotion, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(emotion, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(emotion, is good thing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(emotion, feel good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(emotion, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(emotion, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(emotion, is good thing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(emotion, do have them)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(emotion, get best of us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(emotion, get best of us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(feeling, feel good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(dimension, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(passion, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(compassion, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(empathy, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(affection, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(kindness, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(feeling, feel good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(emotion, get best of us)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(dimension, has quality good)