employee: be at dark

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents other person
Weight: 0.69
, creditor
Weight: 0.64
, driver
Weight: 0.64
, officer
Weight: 0.63
Siblings office worker
Weight: 0.74
, construction worker
Weight: 0.74
, salesperson
Weight: 0.70
, receptionist
Weight: 0.69
, waiter
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at dark 1.00
run red light 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(driver, run red light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(employee, be at dark)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(employee, be at dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(driver, run red light)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(employee, be at dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(driver, run red light)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(driver, run red light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(employee, be at dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(employee, be at dark)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(employee, be at dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(employee, be at dark)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(employee, be at dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(employee, be at dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(employee, be at dark)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(employee, be at dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(employee, be at dark)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(employee, be at dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(driver, run red light)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(employee, be at dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(driver, run red light)