employee: be forced take

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents other person
Weight: 0.69
, partner
Weight: 0.65
, creditor
Weight: 0.64
, officer
Weight: 0.63
Siblings office worker
Weight: 0.74
, construction worker
Weight: 0.74
, salesperson
Weight: 0.70
, receptionist
Weight: 0.69
, waiter
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be forced take 1.00
take in taking 0.78
threaten leave 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(officer, take in taking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(employee, be forced take)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(partner, threaten leave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(employee, be forced take)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(employee, be forced take) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(partner, threaten leave)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(employee, be forced take) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(officer, take in taking)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, be forced take) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(partner, threaten leave)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, be forced take) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(officer, take in taking)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(officer, take in taking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(employee, be forced take) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(employee, be forced take)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(partner, threaten leave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(employee, be forced take) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(employee, be forced take)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(employee, be forced take) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(employee, be forced take)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(employee, be forced take) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(employee, be forced take) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, be forced take)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(employee, be forced take) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(employee, be forced take)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, be forced take) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(partner, threaten leave)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, be forced take) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(officer, take in taking)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(employee, be forced take) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(partner, threaten leave)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(employee, be forced take) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(officer, take in taking)