employee: look for new jobs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents other person
Weight: 0.69
, partner
Weight: 0.65
, creditor
Weight: 0.64
, officer
Weight: 0.63
Siblings office worker
Weight: 0.74
, construction worker
Weight: 0.74
, salesperson
Weight: 0.70
, receptionist
Weight: 0.69
, waiter
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
look for new jobs 1.00
look for jobs 0.98
find new jobs 0.95
find jobs 0.91
jobs 0.90
change jobs 0.89
has state jobs 0.88
leave jobs 0.87
stay in jobs 0.86
really quit jobs 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(employee, look for new jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(receptionist, has state jobs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(employee, look for new jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(waiter, jobs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(employee, look for new jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(receptionist, jobs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(employee, look for new jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, find jobs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(employee, look for new jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(construction worker, find jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(construction worker, find jobs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(employee, look for new jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(receptionist, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(receptionist, jobs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(employee, look for new jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(waiter, jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(waiter, jobs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(employee, look for new jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(receptionist, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(receptionist, has state jobs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(employee, look for new jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(employee, look for new jobs)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(employee, look for new jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(employee, stay in jobs)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(employee, look for new jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(employee, stay in jobs)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(employee, look for new jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(employee, stay in jobs)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(employee, look for new jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(employee, stay in jobs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(employee, look for new jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(employee, look for new jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(employee, look for new jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(employee, look for new jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(employee, look for new jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(employee, look for new jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(construction worker, find jobs)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(employee, look for new jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(receptionist, jobs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(employee, look for new jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(waiter, jobs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(employee, look for new jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(receptionist, has state jobs)