encapsulation: be important in networking

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents principle
Weight: 0.54
, application
Weight: 0.54
, feature
Weight: 0.52
, term
Weight: 0.51
, thing
Weight: 0.51
Siblings layer
Weight: 0.31
, texture
Weight: 0.31
, replication
Weight: 0.31
, attachment
Weight: 0.31
, characteristic
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in networking 1.00
is networking 0.98
be important in network communication 0.80
be important to network communication 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(encapsulation, be important in networking)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(encapsulation, be important in networking)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(encapsulation, be important in networking)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(encapsulation, is networking)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(encapsulation, be important in networking)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(encapsulation, is networking)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(encapsulation, be important in networking)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(encapsulation, is networking)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(encapsulation, be important in networking)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(encapsulation, is networking)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(encapsulation, be important in networking)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(encapsulation, be important in network communication)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(encapsulation, be important in networking)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(encapsulation, be important to network communication)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(encapsulation, be important in networking)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(encapsulation, be important in network communication)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(encapsulation, be important in networking)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(encapsulation, be important in network communication)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(encapsulation, be important in networking)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(encapsulation, be important to network communication)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(encapsulation, be important in networking)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(encapsulation, be important in network communication)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(encapsulation, be important in networking)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(encapsulation, be important to network communication)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(encapsulation, be important in networking)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(encapsulation, be important to network communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(encapsulation, be important in networking)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(encapsulation, be important in networking)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(encapsulation, be important in networking)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(encapsulation, be important in networking)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(encapsulation, be important in networking)