endangered species: be problem for environment

Related concepts

Parents	species Weight: 0.65 , creature Weight: 0.63 , wildlife Weight: 0.62 , conservation Weight: 0.62 , biodiversity Weight: 0.58
Siblings	humpback whale Weight: 0.75 , bald eagle Weight: 0.71 , sperm whale Weight: 0.70 , giant panda Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be problem for environment	1.00
has state problem	0.85
affect environment	0.83
is issue	0.78
is global issue	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(species, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(endangered species, be problem for environment)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(species, is issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(endangered species, be problem for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(endangered species, be problem for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(species, is issue)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(endangered species, be problem for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(species, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(endangered species, be problem for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(species, has state problem)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(endangered species, be problem for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(species, is issue)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(species, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(endangered species, be problem for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(endangered species, be problem for environment)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(species, is issue) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(endangered species, be problem for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(endangered species, be problem for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(endangered species, be problem for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(endangered species, be problem for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(endangered species, be problem for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(endangered species, affect environment)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(endangered species, be problem for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(endangered species, has state problem)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(endangered species, be problem for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(endangered species, is issue)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(endangered species, be problem for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(endangered species, affect environment)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(endangered species, be problem for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(endangered species, affect environment)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(endangered species, be problem for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Salient(endangered species, affect environment)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(endangered species, be problem for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(endangered species, is global issue)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(endangered species, be problem for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(endangered species, is issue)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(endangered species, be problem for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(endangered species, is issue)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(endangered species, be problem for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Salient(endangered species, is issue)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(endangered species, be problem for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(endangered species, has state problem)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(endangered species, be problem for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(endangered species, is global issue)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(endangered species, be problem for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(endangered species, is global issue)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(endangered species, be problem for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(endangered species, has state problem)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(endangered species, be problem for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(endangered species, is global issue)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(endangered species, be problem for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(endangered species, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(endangered species, be problem for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(endangered species, be problem for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(endangered species, be problem for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(endangered species, be problem for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(endangered species, be problem for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(endangered species, be problem for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(species, is issue)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(endangered species, be problem for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(species, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(endangered species, be problem for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(species, is issue)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.34

Typical(endangered species, be problem for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(species, has state problem)