energy: be at food

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.68
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
, element
Weight: 0.62
, crisis
Weight: 0.61
Siblings solar energy
Weight: 0.88
, wind
Weight: 0.62
, kinetic energy
Weight: 0.60
, air
Weight: 0.58
, gamma radiation
Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at food 1.00
be used to cook food 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(energy, be at food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be used to cook food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(energy, be at food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(solar energy, be used to cook food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be used to cook food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(energy, be at food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(energy, be at food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(energy, be at food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(energy, be at food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(energy, be at food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(energy, be at food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(energy, be at food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(energy, be at food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(solar energy, be used to cook food)