energy: be better than gas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.68
, element
Weight: 0.62
Siblings solar energy
Weight: 0.88
, wind
Weight: 0.62
, kinetic energy
Weight: 0.60
, thermal energy
Weight: 0.57
, specific heat
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than gas 1.00
be better than wind 0.79
be better for environment 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(energy, be better than gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be better than gas)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(energy, be better than gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be better for environment)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(energy, be better than gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be better than wind)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(energy, be better than gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(solar energy, be better than gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be better than gas)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(energy, be better than gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(solar energy, be better than wind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be better than wind)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(energy, be better than gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(solar energy, be better for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be better for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(energy, be better than gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(energy, be better than gas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(energy, be better than gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(energy, be better than gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(energy, be better than gas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(energy, be better than gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(energy, be better than gas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(energy, be better than gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(solar energy, be better than wind)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(energy, be better than gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(solar energy, be better than gas)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(energy, be better than gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(solar energy, be better for environment)