energy: be conserved in closed system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.68
, element
Weight: 0.62
Siblings solar energy
Weight: 0.88
, wind
Weight: 0.62
, kinetic energy
Weight: 0.60
, thermal energy
Weight: 0.57
, specific heat
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
be conserved in closed system 1.00
be conserved in system 0.95
be conserved 0.91
is conserved 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(energy, be conserved in closed system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be conserved)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(energy, be conserved in closed system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, is conserved)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(energy, be conserved in closed system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(kinetic energy, is conserved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(kinetic energy, is conserved)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(energy, be conserved in closed system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(solar energy, be conserved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be conserved)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(energy, be conserved in closed system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(energy, be conserved in closed system)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(energy, be conserved in closed system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(energy, is conserved)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(energy, be conserved in closed system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(energy, is conserved)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(energy, be conserved in closed system) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, is conserved)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(energy, be conserved in closed system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(energy, is conserved)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(energy, be conserved in closed system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(energy, be conserved in closed system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(energy, be conserved in closed system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(energy, be conserved in closed system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(energy, be conserved in closed system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(energy, be conserved in closed system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(kinetic energy, is conserved)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(energy, be conserved in closed system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(solar energy, be conserved)