energy: be example of wind

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.68
, element
Weight: 0.62
Siblings solar energy
Weight: 0.88
, wind
Weight: 0.62
, kinetic energy
Weight: 0.60
, thermal energy
Weight: 0.57
, specific heat
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
be example of wind 1.00
be better than wind 0.85
be formed from wind 0.83
eventually affect wind 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be example of wind)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be better than wind)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be example of wind)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be example of wind)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be example of wind)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, eventually affect wind)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(energy, be example of wind)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(solar energy, be example of wind)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be example of wind)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(energy, be example of wind)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(solar energy, be better than wind)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be better than wind)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(energy, be example of wind)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(solar energy, eventually affect wind)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(solar energy, eventually affect wind)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(energy, be example of wind)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(energy, be example of wind)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(energy, be example of wind)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be formed from wind)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(energy, be example of wind)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(energy, be formed from wind)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(energy, be example of wind)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(energy, be formed from wind)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(energy, be example of wind)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(energy, be formed from wind)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(energy, be example of wind)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(energy, be example of wind)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be example of wind)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(energy, be example of wind)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(energy, be example of wind)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be example of wind)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(solar energy, be example of wind)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be example of wind)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(solar energy, eventually affect wind)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be example of wind)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(solar energy, be better than wind)