energy: be related to frequency

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.68
, element
Weight: 0.62
Siblings solar energy
Weight: 0.88
, wind
Weight: 0.62
, kinetic energy
Weight: 0.60
, thermal energy
Weight: 0.57
, specific heat
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to frequency 1.00
be related 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be related to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, be related)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be related to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(thermal energy, be related)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be related to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(specific heat, be related)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(energy, be related to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(specific heat, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(specific heat, be related)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(energy, be related to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(kinetic energy, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(kinetic energy, be related)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(energy, be related to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(thermal energy, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(thermal energy, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(energy, be related to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(energy, be related to frequency)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(energy, be related to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(energy, be related)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(energy, be related to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(energy, be related)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(energy, be related to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(energy, be related)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(energy, be related to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(energy, be related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(energy, be related to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(energy, be related to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be related to frequency)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(energy, be related to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(energy, be related to frequency)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be related to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(specific heat, be related)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be related to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(kinetic energy, be related)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be related to frequency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(thermal energy, be related)