energy: be related to mass

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.68
, element
Weight: 0.62
Siblings solar energy
Weight: 0.88
, wind
Weight: 0.62
, kinetic energy
Weight: 0.60
, thermal energy
Weight: 0.57
, specific heat
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to mass 1.00
have mass 0.93
be related 0.83
depend on mass 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be related to mass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, be related)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be related to mass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(thermal energy, be related)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be related to mass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, be related to mass)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be related to mass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(kinetic energy, depend on mass)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be related to mass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(specific heat, be related)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(energy, be related to mass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(kinetic energy, be related to mass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(kinetic energy, be related to mass)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(energy, be related to mass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(specific heat, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(specific heat, be related)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(energy, be related to mass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(kinetic energy, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(kinetic energy, be related)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(energy, be related to mass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(thermal energy, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(thermal energy, be related)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(energy, be related to mass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(kinetic energy, depend on mass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(kinetic energy, depend on mass)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(energy, be related to mass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(energy, be related to mass)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(energy, be related to mass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(energy, be related)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(energy, be related to mass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(energy, be related)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(energy, be related to mass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(energy, be related)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(energy, be related to mass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(energy, be related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(energy, be related to mass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(energy, be related to mass) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be related to mass)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(energy, be related to mass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(energy, be related to mass)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be related to mass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(kinetic energy, depend on mass)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be related to mass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(kinetic energy, be related to mass)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be related to mass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(specific heat, be related)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be related to mass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(kinetic energy, be related)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be related to mass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(thermal energy, be related)