engineer: drive train

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.70
, expert
Weight: 0.65
, contractor
Weight: 0.65
, construction worker
Weight: 0.65
, employee
Weight: 0.65
Siblings physicist
Weight: 0.57
, geologist
Weight: 0.37
, computer scientist
Weight: 0.37
, architect
Weight: 0.36
, biologist
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
drive train 1.00
oil wheel of train 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(engineer, drive train)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(engineer, drive train)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(engineer, drive train)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(engineer, oil wheel of train)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(engineer, drive train)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(engineer, oil wheel of train)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(engineer, drive train)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(engineer, oil wheel of train)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(engineer, drive train)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(engineer, oil wheel of train)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(engineer, drive train)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(engineer, drive train)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(engineer, drive train)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(engineer, drive train)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(engineer, drive train)