engineer: use area

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.70
, expert
Weight: 0.65
, contractor
Weight: 0.65
, construction worker
Weight: 0.65
, employee
Weight: 0.65
Siblings physicist
Weight: 0.57
, james watt
Weight: 0.54
, geologist
Weight: 0.37
, architect
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
use area 1.00
use you-beams 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(engineer, use area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(engineer, use area)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(engineer, use area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use you-beams)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(engineer, use area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(engineer, use you-beams)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(engineer, use area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(engineer, use you-beams)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(engineer, use area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(engineer, use you-beams)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(engineer, use area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(engineer, use area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use area)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(engineer, use area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(engineer, use area)