engineer: use blueprints

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.70
, expert
Weight: 0.65
, contractor
Weight: 0.65
, construction worker
Weight: 0.65
, employee
Weight: 0.65
Siblings physicist
Weight: 0.57
, james watt
Weight: 0.54
, geologist
Weight: 0.37
, architect
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
use blueprints 1.00
use drawings 0.79
use block diagrams 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use blueprints) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(architect, use blueprints)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(engineer, use blueprints) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(architect, use blueprints) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(architect, use blueprints)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(engineer, use blueprints) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(engineer, use blueprints)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(engineer, use blueprints) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use drawings)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(engineer, use blueprints) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(engineer, use drawings)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(engineer, use blueprints) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(engineer, use drawings)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(engineer, use blueprints) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use block diagrams)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(engineer, use blueprints) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(engineer, use block diagrams)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(engineer, use blueprints) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(engineer, use drawings)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(engineer, use blueprints) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(engineer, use block diagrams)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(engineer, use blueprints) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(engineer, use block diagrams)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(engineer, use blueprints) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(engineer, use blueprints) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use blueprints)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(engineer, use blueprints) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(engineer, use blueprints)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use blueprints) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(architect, use blueprints)