engineer: use newton rather than kilogram as standard unit of force

Property	Similarity
use newton rather than kilogram as standard unit of force	1.00
use newton rather than kilogram as standard unit	0.99
use newton rather than kilogram as unit of force	0.99
use newton rather than kilogram as unit	0.98
use newton rather than kilogram	0.95
be taught theoretically rather than practically in india	0.75

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram as standard unit of force) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram as standard unit of force) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Salient(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram as unit of force)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram as standard unit of force) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram as unit)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram as standard unit of force) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Salient(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram as unit)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram as standard unit of force) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram as unit of force)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram as standard unit of force) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram as standard unit)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram as standard unit of force) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Salient(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram as standard unit)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram as standard unit of force) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Salient(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram as standard unit of force) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram as unit of force)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram as standard unit of force) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram as unit)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.39

Typical(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram as standard unit of force) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram as unit of force)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram as standard unit of force) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram as standard unit)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.39

Typical(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram as standard unit of force) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.39

Typical(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram as standard unit of force) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram as unit)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram as standard unit of force) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.39

Typical(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram as standard unit of force) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram as standard unit)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram as standard unit of force) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(engineer, be taught theoretically rather than practically in india)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.39

Typical(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram as standard unit of force) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(engineer, be taught theoretically rather than practically in india)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram as standard unit of force) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Salient(engineer, be taught theoretically rather than practically in india)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(engineer, use newton rather than kilogram as standard unit of force) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(engineer, be taught theoretically rather than practically in india)

Parents	scientist Weight: 0.70 , expert Weight: 0.65 , contractor Weight: 0.65 , construction worker Weight: 0.65 , employee Weight: 0.65
Siblings	physicist Weight: 0.57 , james watt Weight: 0.54 , geologist Weight: 0.37 , architect Weight: 0.36

engineer: use newton rather than kilogram as standard unit of force

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible