engineer: use pythagorean theorem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.70
, expert
Weight: 0.65
, contractor
Weight: 0.65
, construction worker
Weight: 0.65
, employee
Weight: 0.65
Siblings physicist
Weight: 0.57
, james watt
Weight: 0.54
, geologist
Weight: 0.37
, architect
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
use pythagorean theorem 1.00
use quadratic equations 0.81
use quadratic formula 0.80
use logarithms 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use pythagorean theorem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(architect, use pythagorean theorem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(engineer, use pythagorean theorem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(architect, use pythagorean theorem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(architect, use pythagorean theorem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(engineer, use pythagorean theorem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(engineer, use pythagorean theorem)

Similarity expansion

0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(engineer, use pythagorean theorem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(engineer, use logarithms)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(engineer, use pythagorean theorem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(engineer, use logarithms)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(engineer, use pythagorean theorem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use logarithms)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(engineer, use pythagorean theorem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use quadratic formula)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(engineer, use pythagorean theorem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(engineer, use logarithms)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(engineer, use pythagorean theorem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(engineer, use quadratic formula)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(engineer, use pythagorean theorem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(engineer, use quadratic formula)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(engineer, use pythagorean theorem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(engineer, use quadratic formula)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(engineer, use pythagorean theorem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(engineer, use pythagorean theorem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use pythagorean theorem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(engineer, use pythagorean theorem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(engineer, use pythagorean theorem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use pythagorean theorem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(architect, use pythagorean theorem)