engineer: use scientific method

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.70
, expert
Weight: 0.65
, contractor
Weight: 0.65
, construction worker
Weight: 0.65
, employee
Weight: 0.65
Siblings physicist
Weight: 0.57
, james watt
Weight: 0.54
, geologist
Weight: 0.37
, architect
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
use scientific method 1.00
use science 0.82
use you-beams 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(scientist, use scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(engineer, use scientific method)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(engineer, use scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(scientist, use scientific method)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(scientist, use scientific method)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(architect, use science)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(physicist, use science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(scientist, use scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(engineer, use scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(engineer, use scientific method)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(engineer, use scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(physicist, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(physicist, use science)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(engineer, use scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(architect, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(architect, use science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(engineer, use scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(engineer, use scientific method)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(engineer, use scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(engineer, use scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use you-beams)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(engineer, use scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(engineer, use you-beams)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(engineer, use scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(engineer, use science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(engineer, use scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(engineer, use science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(engineer, use scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(engineer, use science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(engineer, use scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(engineer, use you-beams)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(engineer, use scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(engineer, use you-beams)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(engineer, use scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(engineer, use scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use scientific method)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(engineer, use scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(engineer, use scientific method)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(scientist, use scientific method)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(physicist, use science)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(architect, use science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(engineer, use scientific method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(scientist, use scientific method)