engineering: is boring

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents college
Weight: 0.65
, department
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, science
Weight: 0.63
, major
Weight: 0.62
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, design
Weight: 0.35
, biology
Weight: 0.35
, mathematics
Weight: 0.35
, physics
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is boring 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(science, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(engineering, is boring)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(engineering, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(science, is boring)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(engineering, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(science, is boring)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(engineering, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is boring)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(science, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(engineering, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(engineering, is boring)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(engineering, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(computer science, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(computer science, is boring)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(engineering, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(engineering, is boring)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(engineering, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(engineering, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(engineering, is boring)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(engineering, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(engineering, is boring)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(engineering, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(science, is boring)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(engineering, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(computer science, is boring)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(engineering, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(science, is boring)