english: was evolved

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents translation
Weight: 0.64
, language
Weight: 0.63
, dialect
Weight: 0.61
, tongue
Weight: 0.59
Siblings english language
Weight: 0.70
, chinese language
Weight: 0.69
, spanish
Weight: 0.67
, john smith
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
was evolved 1.00
was developed 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(language, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(english, was evolved)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(english, was evolved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(language, was developed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(english, was evolved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(language, was developed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(language, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(english, was evolved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(english, was evolved)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(english, was evolved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(english, was evolved)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(english, was evolved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(english, was developed)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(english, was evolved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(english, was developed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(english, was evolved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(english, was developed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(english, was evolved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(english, was developed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(english, was evolved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(english, was evolved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(english, was evolved)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(english, was evolved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(english, was evolved)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(english, was evolved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(language, was developed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(english, was evolved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(language, was developed)